Things I've Noticed

Refreshment for Your Mind (© 2009)

My Photo

About

Get Email When I Post or Get Feed To Yahoo



  • Add to My Yahoo!

Google Sidebar Ad

Rome Trip Photography

  • Ceiling Detail St. Peter's Cathedral Vatican

India Trip Photography

  • Rower and Rowboat Wake

Recent Posts

  • Quick Quote on Eating Well
  • Thoughts on the Financial Crisis One Year Later
  • Compliments and Criticism for Compliments
  • Quick Quote on Visionaries
  • Not Being Tall Gets You The Short End of The Stick
  • Quick Quote on Time Management
  • The Auto Industry Has Been Turned Upside Down and Twisted Around
  • Quick Quote on Cleveland Sports 2
  • When Traveling, It’s Better to Overpack than to Underpack
  • Quick Quote on Weather
Subscribe to this blog's feed

Categories

  • Books
  • Business
  • Cars and Trucks
  • Current Affairs
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Film
  • Food and Drink
  • Games
  • Humor
  • Music
  • People
  • Philosophy
  • Photographs
  • Politics
  • Psychology
  • Questions
  • Quick Ten Lists
  • Quotes
  • Religion
  • Science
  • Sociology
  • Sports
  • Television
  • Travel
  • Web/Tech
  • Weblogs

The Auto Industry Has Been Turned Upside Down and Twisted Around

Car-money swirl With all the news about the hurting auto industry, loans from the government, bankruptcies and acquisitions, people tend to lose sight of the fact that the whole automotive world, (something which has been a big part of my life and the lives of millions of others), has been turned on its head.  Sure it may not seem like a big deal, but this is arguably the largest and most important industry on the planet.  The products people buy from it touch our lives daily, inspire us, and allow us the ultimate freedom, mobility.  Cars and trucks are aspirational objects that we often depend on do to just about everything else in life, we judge people by the vehicles they drive, and some people dedicate their lives to careers or hobbies revolving around vehicles.

From the corporate perspective, let’s put it this way, there is hardly a single manufacturer or automotive brand that hasn’t gone through substantial change in the last 5 years, and the pace has recently accelerated.  GM, the formerly largest corporation on the planet that sold almost half the cars we bought in the U.S. is a much smaller version of itself and in financial desperation.  There are a lot more competitors and other factors that made this happen, but that’s just the beginning in describing our upside down automotive world.  The second largest American car company, Ford will probably take over as first, the third largest is now mostly owned by Italian auto company, Fiat, part of which GM owned in the 90’s and sold at a major loss before turning it around.  Fiat, (or its Alfa Romeo division), hasn’t sold vehicles here in more than 20 years and now they have control over many of Chrysler’s old dealers.  Even crazier is the fact that GM used to own part of Subaru, and now Toyota owns part of them.  BMW used to own Land Rover, sold them to Ford and now Tata, (a huge company in India that sells everything from tea to telecom to steel), bought Land Rover and Jaguar from Ford.  So a company from a country that was a British colony now owns one of Britain’s historical car brands.  Had enough craziness?  Well, BMW owns MINI which was purely British, but even more importantly, they own the British ultra luxury brand Bentley while Volkswagen owns Rolls Royce.  Then there are the Swedish car companies.  Saab had been owned by GM for quite a while, but they just sold the brand to a small Swedish supercar maker Koenigsegg.  And now it’s reported that Geely, a Chinese company with a not-so-great safety record is looking to buy the Swedish brand Volvo which is known for safety.  In the last 10 years, we’ve lost the brands Eagle, Geo, Oldsmobile, and Plymouth.  What’s going on?  I feel like I’m in a blender.  GM has closed down Pontiac, also sold Hummer to a Chinese company, sold Saturn to Penske who’s associated with racing, Hertz, and AutoNation.  The latest news says they plan on selling cars from many different international companies under the formerly all-American Saturn badge. 

As if this wasn’t all enough, another Indian motor vehicle manufacturer, Mahindra and Mahindra is going to start selling cars here and Tata is planning on bringing the groundbreakingly low-priced Nano over.  GM’s European division Opel has been sold to both a Russian investor and Magna, a Canadian parts supplier.  Think about it.  A parts company owns a car company.  I don’t know whether I want to buy a Chinese Volvo, an Italian Chrysler, a Malaysian Saturn or an American Chevy.  I do know that I would rather support the U.S. auto industry to keep more jobs and profits in our country.  So, now that my beloved Saab brand is Swedish again and not owned by GM, I doubt that I will buy another new one.  I think I’ll be buying a Cadillac, Chevy, Ford or Mercury.  But those Fiats and Alfa Romeos do look pretty cool.  And I could support my home country a bit more by buying an Indian Jaguar, but Jaguar is not really my style.  Mercedes, BMW, and Volkswagen are doing alright with their government-sponsored health care and pensions that reduce costs to the company for vehicle production.  But there’s news there too.  Mercedes dumped Chrysler and Volkswagen is largely owned by Porsche.  Honda is doing OK given the circumstances while Toyota is hemorrhaging from perhaps trying to grow too fast.  At least the Japanese car companies can thank their government for not only health care and pensions, but for currency manipulation and trade restrictions.  All we need now are for the French to bring Citroens or Peugeots to the U.S. and the car market free-for-all will get more confusing.  As it is, I’m in an automotive daze.  I’m waiting for the dust to settle and I don’t know what to make of it yet.  Maybe I’ll just build my own car, (or buy a bicycle).

June 26, 2009 in Business, Cars and Trucks, Sociology | Permalink | Comments (6)

The U.S. Government Must Provide Loans to Assure The Survival of GM, Ford, and Chrysler

20080222_gm_chrysler_ford_18[1] We’ve heard a lot of news from the press lately about the dire situation the American automobile industry is in. In part due to the “financial hurricane” that the credit crisis has created, the Detroit 3, (D3), including GM, Ford, and Chrysler are on the brink of going bankrupt or closing up completely. As a former GM employee who loves cars, and cares for Detroit, my friends who work in the auto industry and our whole country, I believe that the government must provide loans to the Detroit 3. Blame can be laid on many things but a negative spin about the Detroit 3 has gotten out of control to the point that people have a grudge beyond reason, one that could lead to our government making a horrible decision. I don’t mean to dismiss mistakes of management and the possibly unreasonable demands of the unions up to this point, but the issue is not who we should punish but what we should do now to prevent a catastrophe.

I’ve written on countless numbers of website comment sections and based on what I’ve written, I want to address all the claims others have made as to why they think the Detroit 3 shouldn’t get support in the form of a loan, (not a bail-out). Please don’t quote me on the exact numbers as these are estimates, but read this with the understanding that I do know a lot about the auto industry from experience and interest. Feel free to research some of my general figures.

Here are claims and suggestions listed, with bullets beneath them addressing why the suggestions aren’t feasible, the claims are overstatements or just aren’t true.

The Detroit 3 don’t make cars that people want to buy:
- Ford, Chrysler and GM sell nearly half the vehicles purchased in our country. 50% of the customers are not nobody, and many of these customers are loyal repeat ones.
- The Detroit 3 had fewer competitors in the 70's than they do now, so some market share attrition is bound to occur by virtue of there being more choice.
- GM sells the most mid-sized cars of any manufacturer, but they are spread out amongst many models with different styles but the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry get all the credit for their manufacturers

The D3 only make gas guzzlers and SUV’s:
- They did profit from the SUV craze but so did/do all the other competitors. Consumers tended to equate value with size and the D3 couldn’t get its typical consumer to buy small cars at prices that would be profitable.
- Admittedly, they should have started making hybrids earlier but that’s a small slice of the market. - For the segments that sell the most, American car company vehicles are amongst the most fuel efficient in their segments such as the Chevy Malibu, Saturn AURA and Ford Focus...
http://www.freep.com/article/20081117/COL14/811170379

The quality of vehicles from the Detroit 3 is not nearly as good as that of the Asian and Europeans:
- The quality gap has narrowed significantly and in some cases, D3 products have better quality than Toyota and Honda, (Chevy Malibu and Ford Fusion are prime examples in JD Powers studies.) http://www.freep.com/article/20081117/COL14/811170379
- Toyota recalled more vehicles last year than GM did http://forums.motortrend.com/70/6495664/the-general-forum/recall-numbers-for-2007-honda-toyota-numbers-highe/index.html

If the Detroit 3 go under, the import competitors will just sell more cars and provide just as many jobs:
- The Detroit 3 employ far more people in our country than foreign-based companies. It’s not just at plants but at headquarters white collar professional, engineering and technical jobs.
- If any one of the D3 go under, then many suppliers will go bankrupt leading to more job losses and parts will stop flowing to the Toyota, BMW, Honda plants here. That would lead to (at least temporary) layoffs at the transplant company plants.
- No other company is going to take up slack in our industrial base by starting a large, new auto manufacturing company as the major investment, expertise, low profitability, and economy would be inhibitors. Small companies like Tesla and Fisker will take tens of years to become mass market manufacturers, (assuming they succeed).

Continue reading "The U.S. Government Must Provide Loans to Assure The Survival of GM, Ford, and Chrysler" »

November 25, 2008 in Business, Cars and Trucks, Current Affairs, Politics, Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (9)

Regarding the Ad on The Right: Official Debate

My friend, "The Boss", (but much younger than Bruce Springstein), has created a new site which I find quite interesting.  It's called OfficialDebate.com.  It's just starting up, but it has lots of neat topics that are at times controversial.  Every good debate needs lots of debaters so click on the link and register if you like to argue with people on topics that you know you're right about.  I did.  Please argue respectfully and soon the site will add other interesting features including debates in which the users get to vote to determine the winner.

Oh and tell "The Boss" I sent you there.

+ Atul

January 23, 2008 in Business, Cars and Trucks, Current Affairs, Entertainment, Environment, People, Philosophy, Politics, Psychology, Sociology, Sports, Television, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (2)

Quick Quote on Red Lights

"When it comes to approaching red lights, sometimes slower is faster."

+ Atul

September 06, 2007 in Cars and Trucks, Psychology, Science, Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (0)

GM, Toyota, and The Auto Industry. How About Some Pro-Americanism?

1965_c1421_0563 As a self-proclaimed car fanatic, which is nothing new to anybody who knows me, I took to heart the recent news that Toyota surpassed GM for the top global sales thus far in 2007.  It's sad even though the health of a corporation is not necessarily defined by selling the most of a product.  As any business expert will tell you, there are many other factors involved.  What's saddening about this event are the causes of and the effects of it.  I notice a sense of Anti-Americanism that is pervading the auto industry.  This industry deserves special attention because it is the backbone of our country's industrial base, and when combined with its broader cultural, safety and environmental impacts, I would argue that it is the most important industry on the planet.  Our world would stop without it, (figuratively of course), as so much commerce depends on cars and trucks.

As a former GM employee, I've noticed the media and people in general "riding" the Big 3 or Big 2.5 for all their faults and supposed conspiracies.  Some of the criticism is deserved as they clearly have lobbied against environmental regulation changes when they should just have improved, but this is nothing new to corporations in other industries, ones that we don't blacklist.   European and Asian companies all along have had to produce products for countries with more congested roads and more expensive fuel.  If the foreign companies were in the same situation as the Big 3, they would have responded the same way.   

Whenever there is a recall, the focus becomes more intense if it is GM or Ford having the recall.  Sure, they had some poor products in the 70's and 80's but without getting into stats or surveys, the products really have improved from a functional quality standpoint, and now they are improving from a perceived quality standpoint as well.  (Don't believe Consumer Reports as an unbiased test-house.)  Many commercial fleet vehicles are from Chrysler, GM and Ford.  If they were so unreliable, these fleets would probably not keep buying the vehicles.  After the global sales leadership changed hands, I read one headline that said Toyota "toppled" GM as the number one global automotive producer.  Toppled implies that GM went from first to last.  In reality, Toyota passed GM over the course of decades.  And the race is never over.  Based on what people read, nobody is told that GM sells more mid-sized cars than Toyota or Honda; it's just that the sales are spread out over more brands.

Sure, GM, Ford, and DCX don't have as many hybrids in production, but few people know how many hybrid buses GM has produced and how much of a positive impact they have had on the environment.  The impact is arguably higher than that for all the Priuses that have been sold.  GM's mid-size cars and full size trucks, part of some of the highest selling segments, are among the most efficient in the industry.  People don't know that DaimlerChrysler owns Freightliner and Detroit Diesel who jointly sell some of the most fuel efficient commercial vehicles.  With the huge quantities of fuel that such vehicles have to use, even a 1% improvement in fuel economy can have a significant impact on our dependence on foreign oil and the environment.

Other country's citizens have pride in their nation's products and prefer them to support themselves and their people.  How smart.  We on the other hand jump all over our own companies as if they are evil.  Our government does nothing to level the playing field when it comes to trade protectionism, currency manipulation, and the competitive advantage that other countries provide their companies with socialized medicine. 
We can criticize unions for all that they ask for and provide their workers, but without their prior efforts, our nation's working conditions and living standards would be lower.  World War II would not have been won without the support of Ford, Chrysler and GM.  We should at some level be grateful for these things and for the economic machine that the U.S. auto industry has provided in support of so many other seemingly unrelated industries such as banking, and medicine.

It's hard to be a fan of our country right now based on all that is happening with respect to foreign policy.  But all this unjustified anti-Americanism in the auto industry is twisted.  It impacts all of us indirectly and it severely damages great cities like Detroit and Cleveland.  I find it ironic that Anti-Americanism in other pursuits such as sports or war is generally not accepted by our culture.  I'm not saying that you should only buy an "American car"; true competition improves all companies.  But don't give foreign-based automakers a free pass while dismissing the Big 3.  They are also manufacturers of great driving machines.

+ Atul

April 27, 2007 in Business, Cars and Trucks, Current Affairs, Environment, Politics, Sociology | Permalink | Comments (3)

Ten Years with My Car, Showcasing How Your Vehicle Can Be A Big Part of Your Life

I've perhaps given a bit too much attention to my car on my blog.  (Thanks to Google image links to my blog, I believe it is one of the most popular Saab 900 S's on the internet.)  That's because I'm a car fanatic and I really love this car.  It's a 1997 Saab 900 S with about 125,000 miles on it after ten years of ownership.  I have been obsessed with    Image0711_4 Saabs like the one on the left since I was 10, when I began to appreciate the unique look and the underdog aspect of the car having great performance out a "mere" four cylinders.  After seeing a 1996 version at the N. American International Auto Show in Detroit, and noticing not only the beautiful Scandinavian exterior design but the really cool interior with amazing plated, joystick controlled air vents, I 1997_saab_900_air_vent_joystick decided I had to test drive one.   I clearly remember the day I test drove a similar car and how this non-impulse shopper felt as though I just had to buy one.  I remember how I struggled with the affordability factor for a person who had only started working three years earlier.  My friend said to me on the phone "You're not gonna buy a Saab."  It indeed was beyond my price range, but with the sweet lease deals at the time and a GM employee discount, I was able to make the transaction reasonably affordable.  So I leased it and then as I lived with it, I began to love it, so I had to buy it when the lease ended.  And it's been with me ever since.

There's something about the feel of this car that still puts a smile on my face every time I drive it.  The engine vibrations are pleasant, most bumps reassure you of the solidity and handling of the car, the transmission shifts well and the fuel economy has always been way above the sticker ratings.  It's by no means the best car in the world.  It has always had a bit too much wind noise and the ride can be harsh, it has some cowl shake, and it rolls in turns, but I don't think I could ever give it up.

In the ten years I've owned the car, I have taken about 100 trips to Cleveland to see my family.  I've driven it through 12 states and 2 provinces having taken it to cities like Chicago, New York, Baltimore, Toronto, and Philadelphia.  The extremely comfortable seats, and 18 gallon fuel tank makes it a nice long distance cruiser.  I once drove from Detroit to Montreal, (570 miles), in 8 ½ hours.  That humongous hatchback has saved the day on many occasions allowing me to haul dressers, 32" TV's, chairs, multiple bikes at one time.  It swallows cargo better than many SUV's.  Keeping the car clean and operating well has become a bit of a hobby for me.  I've filled gas in it 367 times to a total of 4,600 gallons and $7,200.  Fuel economy has averaged 26.6 mpg (40% city driving), which is pretty good considering the car is rated at 19 city and 27 highway.  The car hasn't stranded me once.  One major thing that this car has done to me is that it has made me a real Saab fan.  I visit the Saabnet on a daily basis and that has become somewhat of an on-line community for me.  These guys and girls have lots of knowledge about Saabs and anything else "off-topic" that you might want to inquire about.  You can click on the ad to the right near the top right of this page to see what I mean.

So what's my point with the whole spiel on me and my car besides sharing a love-fest type tribute?  It just goes to prove that personal vehicles can take on a significant role in one's life.  My "Caarma" has been with me for trips to work, running errands, many dates, trips to go mountain biking, numerous moves from place to place, and it has seen me through stressful situations and happy occasions reliably and faithfully.  It makes me feel that we need a national "Personal Vehicle Day."  In fact, I hereby declare March 25 as that date whether others follow it or not; (that's when I picked up my car from the dealer in 1997).  I believe we all should show some appreciation to our modern day trusty steeds, our cars and trucks.  They take us places so that we can earn a living, socialize, get the necessities of life done, and sometimes get to the hospital.  They do this for you all while keeping you warm, entertained, comfortable and safe.  So in honor of this new holiday, and in the spirit of spring, I say go perform proper maintenance on your vehicles, give them a wash, a wax job, and a vacuum job.  These are great ways to honor your vehicle, a machine that deserves it.

+ Atul

April 10, 2007 in Cars and Trucks, People, Sociology, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (2)

Quick Questions on Religion and Driving

<<< I've decided to add a new feature.  I will occasionally post "Quick Questions" which will be similar to Quick Quotes in their randomness, but these will be lines you'll be more likely to want to comment on. I'm starting with two questions, one philosphically heavy, the other somewhat goofy. >>>

"Is it possible to love God but dislike religion?"

"Are you really as good a driver as you think you are?"

+ Atul

March 25, 2007 in Cars and Trucks, Philosophy, Psychology, Questions, Quotes, Religion, Sociology | Permalink | Comments (2)

Stationwagons and Hatchbacks Deserve More Respect, (And So Do Their Owners)

Truckster_1 “My name is Atul, and I drive a stationwagon.” At least that’s what a lot of people would want me to say in some kind of stationwagon owner’s anonymous support group. This mostly occurs because I don’t have a wife and kids. To them I say, my Saab 9-3 SportCombi wagon (and most wagons) are faster, more efficient, lighter, better-handling, safer, and definitely sportier than many so-called Sport Utility Vehicles.  SUVs may have more power but the power to weight ratio is better with a wagon than most SUVs.  My 9-3 even holds about the same amount of stuff as some small to mid-sized SUVs.

Even though I catch flack for owning and driving a wagon (and a hatchback), it’s hard to argue with the fact that they are more practical than sedans. For instance, I can put my bicycle back there without taking the front wheel off and I can even put two with one of the front wheels removed. I’ve had my 1997 Saab 900 for almost ten years. My hatchback has saved me hundreds of dollars in U-Haul rental expenses when I was starting off. Hand-me-down furniture fit well in the back whereas a sedan would not have been able to hold any of the dressers, chairs, and tables that I brought from Cleveland to Detroit.   I fit a 32” tube TV which I purchased and my car saved the day when my friend bought a similar TV and could not get it home in her car.

On the efficiency front, my 1997 Saab has averaged 26.5 mpg with about 40% city driving and the 2006 has averaged 28 mpg with about 70% highway miles. This real world fuel economy is competitive with hybrid SUV’s like the Ford Escape hybrid and the Toyota Highlander hybrid. I think I deserve a tax credit too.

In terms of safety, a lighter, lower, better handling vehicle is better at avoiding accidents. I would rather avoid and accident and get to my destination without delay than get into one and suffer less damage, possibly hurting others in smaller vehicles. In an SUV, rollovers are more likely and those really snarl traffic, let alone putting vehicle occupants in a dizzying dangerous situation, (especially if seatbelts aren’t being used in the rear seats).

I feel I’m not alone though. The trend towards hatchbacks is catching on. In Europe, hatchbacks have been considered to be more upscale than sedans. Hatchbacks and wagons are becoming more popular in North America too. The Mazda 3, Audi A3, Honda Fit, and MINI are all considered cool and I believe my Saab 9-3 SportCombi looks sharp as well. (Notice how the Saab marketing folks had to disguise the fact that it’s a wagon by calling it something other than a stationwagon.) We are such a sensitive society.

I declare the dawn of a new era, a time when hatchbacks and wagons are not only practical, but respectable and cool. They’re not just for families with kids anymore.

+ Atul

November 26, 2006 in Cars and Trucks, Sociology | Permalink | Comments (5)

Another Reason To Drive Instead of Taking A Taxi

Standard taxi

I wrote up a while ago that taxi drivers are generally crazy drivers and constantly put your life at risk, but a new reason to be ant-taxi is on the horizon.  On Autoblog, there is a write-up on this new "made for the U.S." taxi design and boy is it hideous as you can tell just from the one photo I pasted above.  I would rather ride around in a Hearse, (a  stationwagon that carries dead people).  Why can't we just use these  Taxi4_tx1_1997British taxi cabs, or normal cars?  Even a minivan looks better.  For me it doesn't matter much because it's almost impossible to get a cab in the Detroit metro area without planning ahead.  We drive everywhere anyway.  I just hope and pray for the sake of New Yorkers that they don't have to ever ride around in these goofy yellow monstrosities.

+ Atul

September 22, 2006 in Cars and Trucks, Current Affairs, Sociology | Permalink | Comments (0)

My 1997 Saab 900 S at 121,000 Miles: Detailed to A Mirror Finish

I spent much of the last two weekends, (probably 15 hours total), detailing my old car, a 1997 Saab 900 S, which I affectionately call "Caarma."  This car has seen some major happenings and lots of places; I've driven it in 12 states and 2 provinces.  So I think it deserved some special treatment.  I must say the it looks really good for 121,00 miles at the age of 9 years and 5 months.  While taking pictures for memory's sake, it appears that the reflective quality of the products I used make my car look more like mirror than black.

P1030398 P1030403_1 P1030401
P1030397
P1030412_1  P1030423_3
P1030376_1 P1030433 P1030430 P1030368 
P1030392_1 P1030391

Products Used:
- Clay Magic Clay Bar
- Meguiar's Deep Crystal Polish
- Meguiar's Show Car Glaze
- Eagle One Nano Wax
- Mother's Back to Black
- Armor All Carpet and Upholstery Cleaner
- Armor All All Purpose Cleaner
- 303 Protectant
- Windex

Special thanks to Jeremy R and Wayne on the Saabnet.
http://saabnet.com/tsn/bb/detail/index.html?bID=5448
Even though it's not a "classic car," I hope to take it to the one-of-a-kind Woodward Dream Cruise in Detroit this year.

+ Atul

July 31, 2006 in Cars and Trucks, Photographs | Permalink | Comments (2)

Next »

Visitors & Subscribers



  • View My Stats

Other Great Blogs

  • Michael's View
  • Creativity is Free
  • Rust Belt Ramblings
  • The Prime Leader
  • Micro Farming & Macro Gardening
  • Travelling Desi
  • Serenade in Green
  • Hairshirt
  • RealityDriven.com
  • Chancelucky
  • What A World
  • Metacool
  • Bella Rossa
  • Manage To Change
  • dETROITfUNK
  • Detroit Essentials
  • Erratic Wisdom

Recent Comments

  • UH2L on The Arrogance of Today-ness and Entertainment Taste Insecurity
  • Victoria M. on Not Being Tall Gets You The Short End of The Stick
  • Edward T. on Compliments and Criticism for Compliments
  • Joe Cayao on The Arrogance of Today-ness and Entertainment Taste Insecurity
  • Wagdan Almansoob on Not Being Tall Gets You The Short End of The Stick
  • Debra Preston on Compliments and Criticism for Compliments
  • Ryan Karol on Compliments and Criticism for Compliments
  • Nick Girimont on Not Being Tall Gets You The Short End of The Stick
  • John F on Compliments and Criticism for Compliments
  • UH2L on Not Being Tall Gets You The Short End of The Stick

Archives

  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009

More...